The IncredibleJulk

rage that will split your pants, but without the unsightly green tint 
« Back to blog

I told you I was bored.

***there should be a general disclaimer about all posts here that they are very rarely read a second time over for misspellings, grammar problems, general lack of cohesiveness, overall poor writing, etc. consider this a warning***

I've been thinking a lot about identity and how we display ourselves in relation to how we want to be perceived. I am usually at the ready to call bullshit on other people's actions, armed with a certainty of the lack of authenticity I am convinced you don't have. I am reticent to use the term poseur, as I think it brings to mind some type of authentic experience that actually exists--that there is some type of essential quality one could attain if they were doing cool-thing A before everyone else, or giving up on uncool-thing D while everyone else was still tricked into its coolness. No, there are no poseurs, but there are a hell of a lot of posture-ers. 

One's identity can be easily displayed using a variety of cultural markers, available in abundance in our consumer driven society. I can let you know exactly the kind of person I am by way of my choices in fashion, media, home decor, intellectual pursuits, food, and even the words I speak. Our quick acceptance of these markers as identity quickly leads to an overwhelming amount of posturing as people strive to cultivate the "coolest" possible personality, at best, claiming authenticity in the least authentic ways possible.

This is why the people I love generally fall into two categories: assholes and sweethearts. I find that people who fall into these categories tend to be the most authentic people around. I should note that the two categories are not mutually exclusive, in fact, it is often the case that the biggest assholes are also the biggest sweethearts. In my experience, these people are pretty unapologetic about their identities. They accept and embrace who they are, and generally don't give a damn whether or not you think they are cool. There is little care given to whether their favorite band is too mainstream, or if the books they read are intellectually challenging enough, in fact, their personalities usually have little to do with what they consume. (I understand that I'm somewhat conflating the terms personality and identity. For the sake of this little nugget o' wisdom, let's call personality the way in which other people perceive our identity. How's that? It might not be true, but it's certainly the way I'm applying it here.)

I'm not going to delineate what makes someone an asshole or a sweetheart, as it defeats the point. It's kind of like being a good Buddhist, or existentialist. The minute you claim to be an existentialist, or to know Zen, you've totally lost it anyway. Maybe they are best understood by what they are not. An asshole is not a dick (duh). A dick is the kind of person that fancies herself as an asshole, so they are insensitive, rude, and brutish on purpose (though it may have seeped into what they do so much they may not recognize it as a conscious effort). Assholes are accidentally insensitive, rude, brutish, etc., and would feel bad if they realized they were causing harm (hence their sweetheart core). Similarly, sweethearts are not phonies. There are plenty of people in this world who will do good things because they are supposed to, or they feel someone is watching, or they are storing up treasures in heaven (really??), basically, they aren't bad people, I'm sure plenty of them are very nice, but you know if you turned your back or there wasn't some rule or law or social contrivance keeping them from being selfish and mean, they would. Sweethearts generally do good things because that's how they feel like acting. They don't stop themselves from being selfish and mean because they are supposed to, they are just not selfish or mean. 

It's so satisfying to be around people who don't seem to be concerned with the way others perceive them (in a genuine way, not in the hyper-self-aware non-chalant cool that seems to pass as people "not caring"), or who are completely up front about being concerned (something about a willingness to be vulnerable about things that most people feel, but aren't honest enough to be up front about is incredibly endearing to me). So here's to you my friends, assholes and sweethearts: the best people on this lonely old rock. 

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments (8)

Jul 10, 2009
Torben Bernhard said...
Great post. It makes me consider the cultural markers I adopt to advertise an identity. The less safe I feel, the more I cling to them. I think there are a lot of assholes and sweethearts out there who fear vulnerability to the extent of constructing cultural signifiers as protecting gates. A punctured hollow image is much less hurtful than an image that mirrors substance.
Jul 10, 2009
Thanks, Torby. I actually think that the very thing that makes someone an asshole/sweetheart is an ability to be vulnerable. It's about not hiding behind things, about being honest with the world about who you are, your hopes/fears, etc. I think it's also an ability to roll with the punches when people inevitably use that vulnerability against them. I suppose I just want people to be honest. What about a person could be so horrible that it has to hide behind disaffection and irony? 
Jul 10, 2009
Torben Bernhard said...
Yeah, I think you are right on. I have tried to combat my own person a
Jul 10, 2009
Torben Bernhard said...
Second time the charm? Yeah, I think you are right on. I have tried to combat my own person aversion to vulnerability. Growing up, I was always afraid of being honest. I suppose I was trying to live up to some abstract masculine ideal that was implanted in me by my friends and older brother. We watched Goodfellas. We got in fights. We never cried. I don't want to be like that. I want to be open and honest with people. The problem is, archetypes are impenetrable. How do you build intimacy with an archetype, mediated by a sort of propaganda?
Jul 10, 2009
We've all been taught that being vulnerable isn't cool. And I guess in some ways, it serves to be detrimental, right? From a social evolutionary standpoint (is that a thing? probably not) it seems like one would be best served to keep their cards close, to always be one step ahead of everyone else as far as relationships are concerned, I mean, if reality TV has taught me anything it's that, "we are here to win, not to make friends." I just think that's bullshit. I think a lot of people have an aversion to vulnerability in themselves, but I also think a lot of people have problems with other people being vulnerable. I know I certainly used to feel that way, where I would be incredibly uncomfortable around people who were willing to be vulnerable with me. I'd often change the subject, make a joke, etc. just to lighten things up. Now, I prefer it. I think that the friendships/relationships that can form when people are willing to really open up to one another are significantly stronger and more interesting than ones based on similar interests, social groups, etc.

Also, I think archetypes are external. Meaning, while we have models to shape us and act as references, we are in no way bound to them. I think the first step in fighting propaganda is in real conversation, intimate discussion. When people are willing to really talk about what's in front of them, rather than accept it as fact/fate, we come closer to being able to make radical change. 

Jul 10, 2009
And, for the record. I'm pretty sure I'm a dick.
Jul 10, 2009
Torben Bernhard said...
Amen.
Jul 10, 2009
Torben Bernhard said...
Amen to your previous post. Not amen to you being a dick ;)

Leave a comment...

 
Got an account with one of these? Login here, or just enter your comment below.
Posterous-login    twitter